Via America’s Lawyer: PFAS chemicals have seeped not only to our nation’s waterways, but also into 100% of nursing mothers’ breast milk. Mike Papantonio and Farron Cousins discuss more. Plus, Microsoft faces a class-action lawsuit for selling biometric data collected from unknowing Uber drivers. Meanwhile, Google is caught unlawfully sharing personal data obtained from millions of users, including children. Attorney Madeline Pendley joins Mike Papantonio to explain how personal data is the most sought-after commodity in today’s mass surveillance marketplace.

Transcript:

*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.

Mike Papantonio:             A new study has found alarming amounts of toxic chemicals in breast milk that could cause severe problems for an entire generation. Wow. I mean, you know, it’s just, it just never ends and we’ve, the fact is this story has been out there a long time. Corporate media is just now picking up on it. Matter of fact, we did this story earlier, before it, before corporate media even knew what was taking place. Talk about it a little bit.

Farron Cousins:                  Yeah. What this major study by, you know, three different universities, a research institute, took samples of breast milk, and what they found was it wasn’t seventy-five percent had traces of these chemicals. It wasn’t 90. It was 100% of the breast milk samples that they tested had these levels of PFAS chemicals that could be damaging to the infant. So we’re, we’re talking about an entire generation being poisoned right now.

Mike Papantonio:             You helped do the research on the, the case that I tried, the PFAA case PFAS case that I tried up in the Ohio river valley, they made two movies about it. One was the devil we know, the other one is dark waters. And in that, in that, in that trial, what we found was that this information has been on the table for the EPA, for, for, for decades, literally for decades.

Farron Cousins:                  Yeah.

Mike Papantonio:             Talking about four decades at the very least. And this is what they knew. They knew it caused cancer. All the animal studies show it, showed cancer. It caused liver disease, it caused liver cancer, caused testicular disease, caused developmental disease. This is what the EPA had and the D and, and the local regulators actually became part of furthering the efforts to get more PFAS into the Ohio river valley. It’s a remarkable story. And it’s just beginning, isn’t it?

Farron Cousins:                  It really is. And we’re finding out again, this poisoning goes so far beyond. I mean, we’re finding these chemicals in areas where human beings don’t even live. We’re finding it in polar bears for God’s sake. That is how widespread these chemicals are. And again, we’ve already poisoned a couple of generations and because of inaction from the federal government, because the companies continue to produce these chemicals, still going out into the waters today, we got a new generation right here getting toxic doses of these.

Mike Papantonio:             You know, as you, matter of fact, you did a story on this for our mag, for national trial lawyer magazine. In, in, in that story, you talk about the fact and I, of course I tried the case. So I had the experts on the stand that said, it’s, biopersistent, means it’s in the environment for 1 million years. It’s bioaccumulative, that means each and every time that you take a drink of it, or you’re exposed to it, it adds to the burden in your body. And more importantly, it’s bioactive. And when you put all those three things together, and now you learn that the most important stage in a child’s life, they’re exposed to 10, 20, 50 times the amount, they should have no exposure.

Farron Cousins:                  Right.

Mike Papantonio:             God didn’t make PFAS. Okay. DuPont and 3M made PFAS.

Farron Cousins:                  Right. And there, there may be not a whole lot we can do at this point to, to stop the poisoning of this generation, other than what we’re doing right now, and what you’ve done, trying these cases, getting the word out. But again, these are chemicals that are still being introduced today. Right. They’re still in use and, and some of the alternatives are proving to be almost equally as toxic. So we’re, we’re at the mercy of corporate America right now. We truly are. And it’s a terrifying place to be.

Mike Papantonio:             Net, Netflix, check out Netflix, the devil we know. It’s going to give you the whole backstory. It’s, it’s scary, scary stuff. Farron Cousins, thank you for joining me. Okay.

Farron Cousins:                  Thank you.

Mike Papantonio:             A class action lawsuit alleges that Microsoft has been quietly profiting off biometric data collected from Uber drivers without their consent. Meanwhile, Google is facing a privacy lawsuit of its own, and it’s a big, big lawsuit. The tech giant was found to be unlawfully selling the personal information of millions of people, including children. Wow. I’ve got Maddie, Madeline to join me here on the, look, first of all, we’ve, we’ve seen this story before in so many iterations over the last, it really started about 10 years ago.

Madeline Pendley:        Right.

Mike Papantonio:             Where there’d be a new story almost every month where our personal data is being used by the government, it’s being used by advertisers, by corporations. It, this is pretty Orwellian, isn’t it?

Madeline Pendley:        Right, it’s completely overwhelming. And just like you said, it’s all these companies all the time, just doing it to make money. So what we’ve seen is personal data, you know, our private information has quickly become the most valuable commodity in the world. So there’s really no incentive for them to stop doing it. And what you mentioned about Uber and Microsoft, basically Uber hired Microsoft to create a security feature in their app that would be facial recognition, basically. So it was designed to kind of keep the drivers safe and sure it was actually that person driving the car, two issues with that. Uber never actually got permission from the drivers to collect that information from them. And then Microsoft had really no protections in place to ensure that information didn’t end up in the wrong hands. And then they went so far as to sell it. So.

Mike Papantonio:             Okay. So, so the Uber driver, so the lawsuit is saying, what you’ve exposed me to, the driver says you’ve exposed me to identity theft.

Madeline Pendley:        Right.

Mike Papantonio:             I mean, it’s very obvious how identity theft could be a big part of that.

Madeline Pendley:        Right.

Mike Papantonio:             You’ve exposed me to fraud.

Madeline Pendley:        Yes.

Mike Papantonio:             Haven’t you?

Madeline Pendley:        Yes.

Mike Papantonio:             Explain, talk, talk about that just a little bit.

Madeline Pendley:        So this to me is a little bit more frightening than your run of the mill data breach. You know, when you think about somebody getting your, you know, your debit card, you cancel it and you get a new one. Someone’s using your credit, you can freeze your credit. Someone gets in your email, you change the password. This has to do with the biometric profile of the driver’s faces. It’s their identity. It’s who they are. It’s what they look like. So for most people, at least, your face is an unalterable piece of information that’s now just out there forever. And it puts them at risk for identity theft.

Mike Papantonio:             Okay, Maddie, once they get that profile, are they able to move into all the other parts that that driver might have? His phone, his computer, is that how expansive this is?

Madeline Pendley:        It’s unclear, but really, I mean, that is what the facial biometric profile is used for. So the drivers have to use it to unlock their app from time to time, people use biometric profiles to unlock their iPhones, to unlock banking information. It’s the same type or caliber of information as like a fingerprint, if someone were to have that information on you.

Mike Papantonio:             Okay. So for example, with a, with a banking and they’ll have machines that it’s biometric here’s, here’s my picture.

Madeline Pendley:        Right.

Mike Papantonio:             I mean, it can literally be a picture.

Madeline Pendley:        Right.

Mike Papantonio:             That they have used and then the accounts, the accounts emptied.

Madeline Pendley:        Yes.

Mike Papantonio:             Okay. So, so I’m, I’m, I’m curious, what, what is Uber’s response to this? I mean, they know, they know that it’s, it’s, it’s far beyond something just minor. They know it’s not for identification of the driver.

Madeline Pendley:        Right.

Mike Papantonio:             They might sell it and say, well, this is for the ride, this is for the, the, the security of the person who rents that Uber for that day.

Madeline Pendley:       Right.

Mike Papantonio:             But it’s, it’s well beyond that, it’s a moneymaker for them, isn’t it?

Madeline Pendley:        Yes. And, and so that’s, that’s part of the issue with Uber. Uber seems to just have kind of messed up and not getting the proper consent and then Microsoft took it and sold it. But that’s definitely the issue that we’re seeing with Google that you mentioned. You know, Google is actively intentionally collecting and selling personal information.

Mike Papantonio:             Okay. Now let me back up just a little bit. There’s leg, which I thought this was just brilliant legislation, that they have that gives the, gives the right, the driver the right to bring this. It’s, it’s called the biometric information privacy act.

Madeline Pendley:        Right.

Mike Papantonio:             Are most states moving to that right now? It’s a state, that’s a state law, actually.

Madeline Pendley:        It is a state law. And so we are seeing a state movement towards it. Most don’t have it right now, but it is the trend to kind of adopt legislation like that.

Mike Papantonio:             Okay. You want to talk about Google?

Madeline Pendley:        Yes.

Mike Papantonio:             Let’s, let’s move there.

Madeline Pendley:        So Google, to me is the Uber situation on steroids. So they’ve been telling people for the last decade, at least, that they are not and would not ever collect our personal information. But we’ve seen they’re doing exactly that.

Mike Papantonio:             That’s how they sell their product.

Madeline Pendley:        Right.

Mike Papantonio:             We’re, you’re, you’re safe with us.

Madeline Pendley:        Yeah.

Mike Papantonio:             You’re, you’re in good hands, right?

Madeline Pendley:        Right. And so by like, you know, users, it’s really anybody with a Google account. It’s anybody who frequently uses Google and there’ll be selling your location while you’re using the internet, your browsing history, sometimes your purchase history and your contact information. And they’re not just selling it to businesses or marketing agencies. They’re actually selling it to political parties and sometimes even the government without a court order. So we’re seeing, I mean, especially over the last, you know, two election cycles, we’ve seen that political parties are weaponizing our personal information in order to target us with ads and manipulate how we think and what we think about. And Google’s part of it.

Mike Papantonio:             Yeah. You started this by saying that it, it, the value of this information, I’ve seen it characterized, it is the new gold.

Madeline Pendley:        Right.

Mike Papantonio:             Gold, oil and diamond.

Madeline Pendley:        Right.

Mike Papantonio:             Business, isn’t it? I mean, is the top of the heap where it comes to, to the ability to make money.

Madeline Pendley:        Yes.

Mike Papantonio:             And I don’t see it, and, and at this point, government has done nothing about it.

Madeline Pendley:        Virtually.

Mike Papantonio:             Corporate media has done very little because they’re, they’re benefiting from it, aren’t they?

Madeline Pendley:        Right. They are.

Mike Papantonio:             They get this information and then they can figure out how to advertise and all, all sorts of things. It’s an ugly story. You know, let’s, let’s take a closer look on another, on another segment, let’s dive down in to where that money actually goes, how it’s distributed. I’d like the real details on that. Okay.

Madeline Pendley:        Okay. And one last thing about the Google situation is how we know they’re doing this. They were fined in 2019 for $170 million, which I mean, I hadn’t heard of, I don’t know if it was private, but when you think about it, these companies, especially Google, they’re never going to stop doing this.

Mike Papantonio:             Yeah.

Madeline Pendley:        I think is what’s so troublesome.

Mike Papantonio:             It’s too profit, $170 million is nothing if you’re generating a billion dollars on the product.

Madeline Pendley:        Right. Google’s the third most valued company in the world at $300 billion.

Mike Papantonio:             Yeah.

Madeline Pendley:        That math checks out that they’re going to keep doing it.

Mike Papantonio:             Time for antitrust to step in here.

Madeline Pendley:        Right.

Mike Papantonio:             Thank you for joining me. Okay.

Madeline Pendley:        Thanks.

Mike Papantonio is an American attorney and television and radio talk show host. He is past president of The National Trial Lawyers, the most prestigious trial lawyer association in America; and is one of the few living attorneys inducted into the Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame. He hosts the international television show "America's Lawyer"; and co-hosts Ring of Fire Radio, a nationally syndicated weekly radio program, with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Sam Seder.