*This clip is from a previously recorded episode of America’s Lawyer*
Via America’s Lawyer: Mike Papantonio and Trial Magazines Editor Farron Cousins discuss how the Loan Shark Prevention Act proposed by Senators Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders has earned support among voters regardless of party lines. The act would cap interest rates on credit cards and loans, combatting the predatory nature of loan sharking, which targets Americans that have few financial options. Plus, RT Producer Sayeh Tavangar joins Mike Papantonio discuss a new program that aims to provide legal counsel to low income tenants that can’t afford it.
Transcript:
*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
Mike Papantonio: Believe it or not, there are more issues than you think that unite both the left and the right and taking on Wall Street greed happens to be one of them. I’m not so, I’m not so sure that the Republicans really are concerned about corporate greed, but whatever has happened here we, we see, we see this developing where you have Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren and AOC, they’re all, they’re all out there saying, look, we need to do something about corporate greed in the way that they were involved with loans.
Things like credit cards. We need to jump behind it and we need to stop, we need to stop these corporations from stealing from Americans. And so everybody seems to agree. That sounds like a good idea. Maybe we ought to, you know, stop them from stealing from Americans. What’s your take on this story?
Farron Cousins: I think this is interesting. Right now we see about 70% of Republicans, 73% of Democrats who all say we agree with this new plan that the Democrats have come forward with to cap credit card and payday loan interest rates at 15%, you cannot go above 15%. Prior to the 1980s we already had caps as a country on interest rates. You couldn’t charge more than x amount. Reagan came along with deregulation. Bill Clinton came along with it. We got rid of the caps. They went crazy with it. Right now, even for somebody with really excellent credit, your interest rate’s about 21% I believe, as of last week.
Mike Papantonio: Let me tell you what strikes me about this story. Finally, the Democrats are talking about something important. They don’t have this, they don’t have this Schiff psycho, this guy that all he had, all he knows is his conspiracy babble. All he knows is Trump hate. Maybe, maybe the Democrats finally understand that when you talk about important issues, you can bring in both sides. When you stop talking about conspiracy and hate Trump, look, there’s plenty of people that hate Trump.
We’re tired of hearing it. The conspiracy, Russia, the Russia conspiracy, come on really? And so and so you’re going, but you still have, what did they call him? Pencil neck Schiff. The, so you’ve still got this character out there, Schiff, talking about these issues. On the other side, you’ve got AOC, right? You’ve got Elizabeth Warren, you’ve got Bernie Sanders out trying to talk about real issues that maybe can help the Democrats win an election. Take it from there.
Farron Cousins: They’re, they’re out there talking about things that directly affect somebody’s wallet, their personal bank account, whether it’s Republican or Democrat or whatever it is in between. They’re out there saying, listen, this isn’t a partisan issue. This is a thing that affects a Republican’s ability to take care of their family. It affects a Democrat being able to take care of their family, and that’s who people want to hear. They want to hear, say, hey, this person has a policy. Okay, they may be a Democrat and I’m a Republican, but it’s a good policy that would directly benefit me. Somewhere along the lines in the last 40 years, we got away from that. Politicians stopped offering policies.
Mike Papantonio: Look, here’s, here’s the truth. Over the most of the 20th century, you had, 20th century now, you had caps. You had say you can’t, you can’t get past this point, when you go charging. And then all of a sudden there was deregulation. And when deregulation took place, all of this bad stuff started occurring. You know, Wall Street stole from mom and pop. The economy crashed. You know, people were charged 80% sometimes on, on credit cards.
So, I mean, you know, you’ve gotta, you gotta say we’re in a different time. Maybe the Democrats will get the, get the message, start talking about table talk, dinner talk instead of social issues and crazy Schiff conspiracies, and maybe they’ll accomplish something. Farron, thank you for joining me. Okay.
Farron Cousins: Thank you.
Mike Papantonio: Hundreds of thousands of low income tenants are evicted every year from their homes across the US; many without the help of an attorney and a court hearing. Some cities and states are hoping to change this and are looking at a new program in New York City as a model. RT producer, Sayeh Tavangar, joins me now to talk about this story. Sayeh, why did New York start this program?
Sayeh Tavangar: Well, Mike, New York City is one of the costliest places to live in a country where salaries have not kept up to date with soaring rents there for more than 80,000 eviction proceedings were filed last year. Historically, only one in 10 tenants have been represented by attorney while most landlords have lawyers. Therefore, evictions have been a major driver of housing instability and homelessness for low income New Yorkers.
Now in the past, tenants facing evictions usually arrive to Housing Court without legal representation at a major disadvantage to landlords who almost always have an attorney, but now this is changing. After years of advocacy, New York became the first city in the country to launch what they call “right to counsel.” This law will give tenants with incomes below 200% of the federal poverty level who are facing an eviction and housing court access to free attorney.
Mike Papantonio: Even with the best attorney, the housing courts are going to be faced with the ultimate question of does the tenant have the money to pay the rent or not? I mean, at the end of the day, that’s really the question. They can be well represented, but the question’s always going to come down to that basic dispute.
Sayeh Tavangar: Well Mike, not all tenant disputes are about money, actually. Consider the case of Nadia Mater who lived in a rundown apartment building in the Bronx that had been plagued with leaks, rats, and roaches. Nadia didn’t even have heating or cooking gas September of last year, and even had to cook on a hot plate since her heat only came on sporadically. Now as a result of this new program, tenants in her building organized a legal suit against the landlord to fight for their rights, and as a result, won. Now if their landlord retaliates, they now all have access to free legal help.
Mike Papantonio: Well you know you get what you pay for, and I’m wondering how much money is being put into this program. You could say, yeah, we’re going to have attorneys, we’re going to have a program, but the real question comes down to, is it a series program? Is there real money being put into it? Is it something that’s sustainable, or is it here today and gone tomorrow? What’s your take on it?
Sayeh Tavangar: Well, the program is currently being phased in over five years and New York City’s 2018 budget included $155 million for the first phase of the program, which is reaching 20 of New York City zip codes, but lawmakers say this cost is actually well worth the price, which has already drastically reduce homelessness in the city. As a result of this program, new city has seen a dramatic drop in evictions. 84% of households who have been evicted earlier this year that were represented by lawyers now are able to remain in their homes.
And now all of the right to counsel program was originally launched in 2017, it’s now finally being phased in by zip codes and city officials say 30% of tenants facing eviction or have access to lawyers. And Mike, it’s also worth noting that this program is not just for home evictions, but also helps tenants get home repairs that they need, and also helps to make sure that the rent that’s being charged is a lawful rent, and to make sure that tenants are not being displaced from their apartments as a result of harassment.
Mike Papantonio: Well it sounds creative and I’m wondering, are there any other states that are following this idea that really sounds like it could work if it’s properly financed?
Sayeh Tavangar: Yes. While New York, obviously it was the first city in the US to pass the right to counsel program. Now, San Francisco and New York, New Jersey have both adapted similar legislation, and both cities are actually poised to reach an even higher share of tenants to New York City. And now lawmakers in Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Minnesota are also now considering its statewide proposal to provide free attorneys to struggling renters.
And although the program is currently only available to low income tenant households who experienced the highest rent burden and eviction, some states are also looking to provide this service to moderate income tenant households who are also experiencing housing instability and are also vulnerable to evictions. For example, in New York City, the moderate income is about $81,000 for family of three.
Now Mike, the majority of households in the moderate income category work in health care, education, social services or retail, hospitality, and food service, and only actually 88% live in unregulated housing and don’t receive any form of housing assistance such as section eight. So all in all, there seems to be consensus among legal scholars and academics that access to an attorney, reduces evictions and increases housing stability drastically.
Mike Papantonio: Sayeh, thanks for joining me. I hope this does take hold because it could be used in many, many more places than New York City. Thanks for joining me.
Sayeh Tavangar: Absolutely.
