*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.
Mike Papantonio: When you walk through the airports, you may notice that all the TVs around you are tuned to CNN. This isn’t a coincidence. The war mongering network has a virtual monopoly on airport TVs, forcing airline passengers to walk their corporate sponsored content.
This is an interesting story to me … Do you remember the run up to Iraq, you would walk through an airport, and I have never seen such war mongering as was coming from CNN. Remember the big maps they had on the floor? And, Wolf Blitzer would walk around and, “We’re sending in our troops here, and we’re sending in reporters.”
It was like, they couldn’t wait to get to war. And so, everybody walking through an airport thought, “Oh my God.” You know? “Iraq, they’re responsible for 9/11, Sudan Hussein, he’s at the heart of all this.” CNN, along with the other cable sold that story, right?
Farron Cousins: They did, and what’s interesting, too, and CNN is still 100% this way, and we’ll get to that in a moment, but CNN sold that war to the American people, they did it more than Fox, they did it more than MSNBC. They did it more than The New York Times, even. They were the ones who convinced the American public, as you just said, that Sudan Hussein was somehow involved with those plane hijackings, you know 9/11, this guy was linked to it.
They did everything they could to sell this, and now, just like back then, you’re gonna walk through an airport and all you’re gonna see on the TVs is CNN, and it’s because that they’ve worked this deal, these contracts to be the only network that can be shown in the hallways, or in the waiting areas, at the gates at airports. So you have no choice.
Mike Papantonio: Well, the reason this is such an important story to me, it wasn’t just Iraq. It was Syria, the next thing, “We gotta go to Syria.” Go all the way back to Iran. Where do they make their money? Where does cable make their money? It makes it make it in the … Now, they’re trying to sell a war with Russia, I mean, hell, we’ll be having ballistic missiles between the US and Russia, if CNN gets its way. So, here’s my point about this.
If you look at trends, you’ve done so many stories on trends with cable to begin with, your theory is, that cable is almost RIP, it’s almost rip cable. So, rest in peace cable, where do you see this kind of story fitting into where things are going? We should be able to walk through an airport and not be confronted with this.
Farron Cousins: I think so, I think there’s absolutely no reason to have a network like CNN when you’re traveling, you don’t need to be subjected to this. And again, this is essentially, for the most part, this is corporate propaganda, they’re doing this, they’re selling wars, they’re selling Saudi Arabia and Yemen right now-
Mike Papantonio: Right, exactly-
Farron Cousins: … pushing for more attacks, more missiles, more bombs, ’cause then the commercials come on, and it’s a commercial for Boeing.
Mike Papantonio: Right.
Farron Cousins: Okay, well, who’s watching CNN that’s gonna go out and say, “You know what? I’m gonna go buy a Boeing.” Why-
Mike Papantonio: I’m gonna buy a missile. I’m gonna buy a cruise missile for … Yeah.
Farron Cousins: Nothing about that makes any sense, and then the other half of the commercials on there are pharmaceutical. So, they’re not gonna talk bad about pharmaceutical, they’re not gonna talk bad about war, they’re gonna help sell it. So, you’re not getting actual news, you’re really not. You’re getting a watered down … The only time CNN is happy with Donald Trump, remember after they all said, “Well, now he’s presidential.” Was after he sent all of those missiles over to Syria!
Mike Papantonio: Yeah, I remember that, yeah, he gets involved with escalating war, bombs Syria, and CNN, “Now, this is presidential.” I mean, you gotta wonder, who in the hell are the people making these decisions … But, here’s the point, look. If I’m making this argument, I’m saying this. Tax payer money subsidized airports, okay?
So, tax payers pay for the infrastructure, they pay for a lot of things on the airport, so tax payers are now going up to the people working in the airports, saying, “Turn off CNN, I wanna watch something else, or I don’t want to watch anything.” Do they have the right to do it? Yeah, they have the right to do it.
But, the point you’re pulling is, why have anything on the screen? Why not simply have a wifi, expanded, wifi ability at an airport, to where people go use their personal devices anyway?
Farron Cousins: Exactly. And, when you have CNN … These were up for contracts and CNN bid to pay the most to have it, so technically we let the corporation come into this tax payer funded thing, and buy it. We don’t get the profits from it at all, we’re just subjected to constant war mongering. But, they could have had companies come in and say, “All right, we’re gonna bid on who’s gonna provide the free wifi for everyone in this airport.”
And then, when they connect you get a quick little ad that pops up, they close it, but they know that you paid for it, and then that’s it. They can look and watch it whatever we want, I mean, we’ve got these monitors, show funny cat videos, or something. It doesn’t have to be CNN.
Mike Papantonio: Exactly, but there was a day when CNN, even with their war monger history, was considered the most neutral. If you can imagine, they were the most neutral network, then Zucker comes in … He comes in and he says, “Look, all that really matters are ratings.” And so we escalate the possible war with Russia, we escalate the … Trump becomes a hero when he bombs Syria, so I mean, we gotta do something about it.
I think there is the argument that there are tax payer rights here, and if we’re subsidizing the airport in any kind of way with tax money, people shouldn’t be subjected to what they don’t wanna … What they think is a total fraud to begin with.